To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
插一句嘴。
我認同「最潔身自愛」和「最有資格講句公道話」中間不應存有關係, 因為要求「最潔身自愛」本身就選了立場, 有了取態, 其「公道」話靠了邊出發, 何來公道?
但我並不認同公道話無需要資格。最明顯的是說一套做另一套的虛偽之輩, 於我看來其說話便不可能公道, 因為他自己本身就作弊了, 其道理沒有能過得到自己的, 遑論推而廣之, 及至公眾, 做為公道。
所以說公道話真的需要資格, 只是這個資格絕非「最潔身自愛」, 況且這點也無從評判。
[Comment ID #1148 Will Be Quoted Here]
你說的也有道理